Your contract should be a living document, not a time capsule.

Businesses change. Your docs should too—without paying a lawyer every time.

MAKE IT HAPPEN
Flexible Agreements
Greater Transparency
Built-in Dispute Resolution
Arbitration Ready
$30K+

Traditional cost for partnership legal work over 3 years

70%

Of partnerships fail due to relationship issues, not business problems

6-18

Months typical litigation takes when partners disagree

REAL SCENARIOS, REAL SOLUTIONS

Most partnership agreements are signed on day one and forgotten until something goes wrong. By then, it's too late. Here's how DoneDeal changes that story.

1

The Compensation Conversation

Sarah and Mike co-founded a tech startup. Their initial agreement set Mike's salary at $8,000/month and Sarah's at $6,000/month, reflecting that Mike took more financial risk early on.

Six months later, Sarah has taken on all sales, operations, and client management. She believes her compensation should match Mike's. But raising this feels awkward, and changing the agreement means expensive legal fees.

THE TRADITIONAL WAY:

Sarah bottles up resentment for months
Eventually confronts Mike via heated email
Mike feels blindsided and defensive
They schedule a $2,500 meeting with their lawyer
Lawyer drafts amendment for another $800
Process takes 6 weeks, relationship strained
Cost: $3,300 + damaged trust

THE BETTER WAY:

Sarah opens "Request Discussion" in platform
States case clearly in structured format
Mike receives notification with full context
They discuss via platform thread (AI keeps the tone in check)
Agree on $7,500/month compromise
Both click "Approve Amendment"
Living agreement updates automatically with audit trail
Process takes 4 days, relationship strengthened
Cost: $0 (included in subscription)

THE OUTCOME:

Sarah and Mike's agreement now shows: "Sarah Chen: $7,500/month (Updated: Oct 2025, Reason: Expanded role in operations and sales)". Six months later when they need to make another adjustment, they know exactly how to do it—and that it won't cost them thousands of dollars or weeks of waiting.

2

When the Agreement is Silent

Emma and David run a consulting firm. Their partnership agreement says "Profits distributed quarterly based on equity percentage." Simple enough.

Q3 arrives with $100K in profit. But there's also a $80K opportunity to invest in new equipment that could double their capacity. Emma wants to reinvest. David needs his distribution to cover personal expenses. The agreement says nothing about reinvestment decisions.

THE TRADITIONAL WAY:

Emma and David argue about fiduciary duties
David demands his distribution per the agreement
Emma threatens to block the payment
They hire separate lawyers ($5,000 each)
Legal dispute over interpretation of "profit distribution"
Lawyers negotiate for 3 months
Eventually settle on splitting difference
Cost: $10,000+ in legal fees + lost opportunity
Partnership barely survives

THE BETTER WAY:

Dispute flagged in platform: "Agreement doesn't specify this situation"
System offers mediation
Mediator reviews platform history of their growth vs. income discussions
90-minute mediation session explores creative solutions
Mediator suggests: "What if you distribute $60K and reinvest $40K?"
Both partners agree + add new term to living agreement
New clause: "Reinvestment over $50K requires unanimous approval"
Process takes 1 week, relationship intact
Cost: $338 in mediation fees

THE OUTCOME:

Emma and David's living agreement now has a clear reinvestment policy that didn't exist before. When Q4 arrives with another reinvestment opportunity, they already know the process. The ambiguity that could have destroyed their partnership instead clarified their terms and strengthened their relationship.

3

The Accountability Gap

Alex and Jordan are equal partners in a real estate firm. Alex handles acquisitions, Jordan manages operations. Their agreement specifies roles but has no mechanism to track whether either is actually doing their job.

Jordan notices Alex has missed the last 4 weekly acquisition reports. Properties are being overlooked. When Jordan finally brings it up, Alex is defensive: "I've been busy, why are you tracking me?"

THE TRADITIONAL WAY:

No evidence of pattern, just "he said, she said"
Alex claims Jordan is being controlling
Jordan feels gaslit about legitimate concerns
Resentment builds over months
Small issue becomes major trust breach
Eventually requires legal intervention
Partnership likely ends in buyout or dissolution
Cost: $15K-$50K + destroyed business relationship

THE BETTER WAY:

Platform automatically tracks commitment: "Alex: Weekly acquisition reports"
After 2nd missed report, gentle automated reminder to Alex
After 4th miss, system prompts: "Discuss with partner or modify commitment?"
Jordan opens discussion: "I see you've been missing reports. Everything okay?"
Alex explains he's overwhelmed with deal volume
They agree to modify: "Bi-weekly reports + dashboard with key metrics"
Amendment approved, issue resolved
Process takes 2 days
Cost: $0

THE OUTCOME:

The platform's commitment tracker showed a clear pattern, removing any ambiguity. Instead of a trust-destroying confrontation, Alex and Jordan had a productive conversation about workload. They modified their agreement to better fit reality, and the platform now tracks the new commitment structure. Six months later, both partners are meeting their obligations and the business is thriving.

SEE IT IN ACTION

Here's what your partnership management dashboard actually looks like. Every feature you see below is real and working from day one.

Living Agreement
Amendment History
Commitments
Chat
Help
Action Items 3
VERSION 2.7 - CURRENT

1. PARTNERS & EQUITY

Sarah Chen (CEO) - 40% equity

Mike Rodriguez (CTO) - 40% equity

Emma Thompson (CFO) - 20% equity

2. ROLES & RESPONSIBILITIES

Sarah Chen: Day-to-day operations, client relationships, vendor negotiations over $10K ADDED OCT 10

Mike Rodriguez: Product development, technical architecture, engineering team management

Emma Thompson: Financial planning, accounting, investor relations

3. COMPENSATION

Sarah: $7,500/month UPDATED SEPT 15

Mike: $8,000/month

Emma: $6,000/month

4. DECISION MAKING

Major decisions (>$25K, new hires, strategic partnerships): Unanimous approval required UPDATED AUG 20

Operational decisions (<$25K): CEO approval

Emergency decisions: CEO with 30-day ratification requirement

5. PROFIT DISTRIBUTION

Quarterly distributions based on equity percentage

Reinvestment decisions over $50K require unanimous approval ADDED SEPT 1

This is a living document. All changes are tracked, auditable, and instantly updated. View full amendment history in the Timeline tab.

AMENDMENT HISTORY

OCTOBER 10, 2025
Added vendor negotiation authority
Sarah now handles all vendor negotiations over $10,000. Approved unanimously after discussion about vendor consolidation strategy.
SEPTEMBER 15, 2025
Updated Sarah's compensation to $7,500/month
Reflects expanded role in operations and sales. Mike proposed after quarterly review showed Sarah handling 60% of client-facing work.
SEPTEMBER 1, 2025
Added reinvestment approval policy
Result of Q3 equipment purchase discussion. Clarifies that major reinvestment decisions (>$50K) require unanimous partner approval.
AUGUST 20, 2025
Modified decision-making thresholds
Increased major decision threshold from $10K to $25K to allow faster operational decisions. All partners agreed this would improve agility.
AUGUST 3, 2025
Clarified client assignment responsibilities
After minor confusion about who should handle Enterprise accounts, specified that accounts >$100K annual value require CEO involvement.
JULY 15, 2025
Master Agreement Executed
Initial partnership agreement signed by all partners. Includes foundational terms and comprehensive dispute resolution clause.

COMMITMENT TRACKER

Mike: Submit Q3 financials by Oct 1
Completed Sept 28 (3 days early)
COMPLETE
Sarah: Hire marketing manager by Oct 15
In progress - 5 days remaining
IN PROGRESS
Emma: Finalize investor deck by Oct 8
Completed Oct 7
COMPLETE
Mike: Weekly engineering updates
Missed 1 of last 4 weeks
NEEDS ATTENTION
Sarah: Quarterly all-hands presentation
Due Oct 20
UPCOMING
Emma: Monthly financial reports
Completed Oct 1
COMPLETE
Partnership Health Score: 94/100

All partners are meeting most commitments. One minor concern flagged for discussion.

PARTNER DISCUSSION: Q4 MARKETING BUDGET
SARAH CHEN
Hey team, I wanted to discuss our Q4 marketing budget. We originally allocated $15K, but I'm seeing some really strong opportunities with the new digital campaigns. Would love to increase it to $28K.
Oct 10, 2:34 PM
MIKE RODRIGUEZ
That's a big jump. What's the expected ROI? We also need to consider the engineering tool upgrades we discussed—that's another $12K.
Oct 10, 2:41 PM
SARAH CHEN
Fair point. Based on Q3 results, we're seeing 3.5x return on paid campaigns. The $13K increase could potentially bring in $45K additional revenue. As for the engineering tools, can we push those to Q1?
Oct 10, 2:47 PM
MIKE RODRIGUEZ
Hmm, pushing engineering tools affects our product roadmap. What if we meet in the middle—$22K for marketing and keep the $12K for tools? That's $34K total vs. $40K if we do both full amounts.
Oct 10, 3:02 PM
SARAH CHEN
I can work with $22K. Emma, does this fit within our cash flow projections?
Oct 10, 3:15 PM
EMMA THOMPSON
Looking at the numbers... yes, $34K works. We have sufficient runway and the ROI Sarah mentioned makes this reasonable. I'd suggest we formalize this as a Q4 budget amendment to our agreement.
Oct 10, 3:28 PM
🤖 AI ASSISTANT
CONVERSATION TONE
Collaborative and respectful. All partners engaging constructively.
DECISION THRESHOLD
This decision ($34K) exceeds the $25K major decision threshold. Unanimous approval required per agreement.
💡 SUGGESTED AMENDMENT

Section: Financial Planning

Proposed Change: Add Q4 2025 budget allocation:

• Marketing: $22,000 (increase from $15,000)
• Engineering Tools: $12,000 (new allocation)

Total Impact: $34,000

Rationale: Based on 3.5x ROI demonstrated in Q3 campaigns and critical engineering infrastructure needs.

DRAFT AMENDMENT
FOLLOW-UP ITEMS
• Track Q4 marketing ROI for Q1 planning
• Schedule Q1 engineering tool budget review
PARTNERSHIP HEALTH: Strong collaborative discussion. Partners demonstrating flexibility and data-driven decision making.

RESOLUTION CENTER

Get help when partners disagree or need neutral guidance

CURRENT STATUS
NO ACTIVE DISPUTES
3
Total Resolved
1.2
Avg Weeks to Resolve
$800
Total Mediation Cost

RESOLUTION OPTIONS

💬
Request Mediation
A neutral mediator helps facilitate discussion and find common ground. Non-binding but highly effective.
$225/hour
⚖️
Start Arbitration
Binding resolution by neutral arbitrator. Decision is legally enforceable. Used when mediation doesn't resolve the issue.
$1,000 + $375/hour

RECENT RESOLUTION HISTORY

Q3 Profit Reinvestment Decision
RESOLVED
Mediation successful. New clause added to agreement. Cost: $450 | Duration: 1 week
Client Assignment Clarification
RESOLVED
Resolved through platform discussion. Agreement updated. Cost: $0 | Duration: 3 days
Decision-Making Threshold Update
RESOLVED
Mediation helped partners agree on new $25K threshold. Cost: $450 | Duration: 5 days

PENDING ACTION ITEMS

Review and vote on proposed amendments to your partnership agreement

Q4 2025 Budget Allocation Amendment
URGENT
⚠️ VOTE REQUIRED BY: October 12, 2025 (2 days remaining)
📝 Proposed by: Sarah Chen
📅 Submitted: Oct 10, 2025
💬 Discussion: 12 messages
Summary: Following the partner discussion in Chat, this amendment proposes increasing Q4 marketing budget from $15,000 to $22,000 and allocating $12,000 for engineering tools. Total additional expenditure: $19,000. Expected ROI on marketing: 3.5x based on Q3 data.
PROPOSED CHANGES TO SECTION 6: FINANCIAL PLANNING
- OLD: Q4 Marketing Budget: $15,000
+ NEW: Q4 Marketing Budget: $22,000
- OLD: No engineering tools allocation
+ NEW: Q4 Engineering Tools: $12,000
Sarah Chen
APPROVED
Mike Rodriguez
APPROVED
Emma Thompson (You)
PENDING
Remote Work Policy Update
MEDIUM
📝 Proposed by: Mike Rodriguez
📅 Submitted: Oct 8, 2025
💬 Discussion: 6 messages
Summary: Update partner work location requirements to allow for permanent remote work options. Current agreement requires all partners to work from office 4 days/week. Proposed change allows flexible remote work with monthly in-person meetings.
PROPOSED CHANGES TO SECTION 2: ROLES & RESPONSIBILITIES
- OLD: Partners required in office 4 days/week minimum
+ NEW: Partners may work remotely with mandatory monthly in-person strategy meeting
+ NEW: Emergency in-person meetings required with 48hr notice
Sarah Chen
APPROVED
Mike Rodriguez
APPROVED
Emma Thompson (You)
PENDING
Annual Revenue Milestone Bonuses
LOW
📝 Proposed by: Emma Thompson
📅 Submitted: Oct 5, 2025
💬 Discussion: 8 messages
Summary: Establish milestone-based bonus structure for partners when company hits revenue targets. Proposes 5% of excess revenue above target to be distributed equally among partners as performance bonus.
PROPOSED CHANGES TO SECTION 3: COMPENSATION
+ NEW: Annual Revenue Milestones:
+ If revenue exceeds $1M: 5% of excess split equally among partners
+ If revenue exceeds $2M: 7% of excess split equally among partners
+ Bonuses paid quarterly based on rolling 12-month revenue
Sarah Chen
PENDING
Mike Rodriguez
PENDING
Emma Thompson (You)
APPROVED

📋 How Voting Works

All amendments require majority approval per your partnership agreement. Once all partners vote to approve, the amendment automatically updates your living agreement with full audit trail. You can discuss any item before voting, and proposals can be modified based on feedback.

WHAT YOU GET

Living Document

One agreement that updates in real-time. Version history preserved forever.

Instant Amendments

Propose, discuss, approve. Changes take effect immediately with full audit trail.

Commitment Tracker

Automatic monitoring of who's doing what. No more "I didn't know."

Health Check-Ins

Quarterly assessments catch problems early before they become crises.

Dispute Resolution

Built-in mediation and arbitration. Fast, affordable, binding.

Complete Transparency

All partners see everything. No secret deals, no surprises.

Mobile Access

Approve changes, track commitments, communicate from anywhere.

Full History

Every discussion, decision, and change documented and searchable.

Award Enforcement

If arbitration needed, we handle everything through to judgment.

PRICING

STARTER

$1,500
ONE-TIME SETUP
$99/mo
PER AGREEMENT
  • Master agreement creation
  • Living document platform
  • Unlimited amendments
  • Basic commitment tracking
  • Quarterly check-ins
  • Version history
  • Mobile access
GET STARTED

ENTERPRISE

Custom
CONTACT US
Custom
VOLUME PRICING
  • Everything in Professional, plus:
  • Multiple partnerships
  • Custom workflows
  • API access
  • White-label options
  • Training sessions
  • Legal consultation included
  • Custom SLAs
CONTACT SALES

Mediation: $225/hour | Arbitration: $1,000 + $375/hour

VS. TRADITIONAL APPROACH

TRADITIONAL

$3,000-$10,000 initial agreement
$500-$2,000 per amendment
Partners avoid changes (too expensive)
Small issues become big lawsuits
$20K-$200K+ in litigation
6-18 months to resolution
~$100,000+
Over 3 years

DONEDEAL

$1,500-$3,000 setup
$0 per amendment (unlimited)
Easy evolution encourages changes
Issues addressed early
$1,000-$5,000 mediation/arbitration
2-8 weeks to resolution
~$8,000-12,000
Over 3 years

FOR ENTERPRISE: INTERNAL TEAM ALIGNMENT

DoneDeal isn't just for partnerships between individuals—it's also a powerful tool for managing agreements and accountability within organizations. Mature companies use our platform to keep internal teams, departments, and cross-functional projects aligned with minimal overhead.

Cross-Functional Projects

Marketing, Engineering, and Sales working together? Define roles, track commitments, resolve conflicts when priorities clash.

Department Agreements

SLAs between IT and Operations, or Finance and Product. Living agreements that evolve as business needs change.

Management Accountability

AI-assisted monitoring with light human touch. Perfect for distributed teams or companies with complex reporting structures.

Think of it as "relationship management as a service" for your internal operations. Let's talk about how this fits your organization—schedule a call.

UNDERSTANDING MEDIATION & ARBITRATION

Mediation

What it is: A facilitated conversation where a neutral third party helps partners find common ground. The mediator doesn't make decisions—they guide the discussion.

In DoneDeal: Our platform flags when conversations are stalling or when partners request help. Human mediators review the full context (all platform discussions, commitments, and history) before the session, making mediation faster and more focused.

The outcome: If partners reach agreement, it's documented in the platform and becomes part of the living agreement. If not, partners can choose arbitration or live with the status quo.

Arbitration

What it is: A binding process where a neutral arbitrator reviews evidence and makes a final decision. It's like a private court—faster and cheaper than litigation.

In DoneDeal: Your master agreement includes a comprehensive arbitration clause, meaning all partners agreed upfront to use this process. The platform provides complete documentation—discussion history, commitment records, amendment trails—giving the arbitrator everything they need.

The outcome: Arbitration decisions are legally binding and enforceable in court. The ruling automatically updates your living agreement, creating clarity going forward.

STOP FIGHTING FIRES.
START PREVENTING THEM.

Give your business the resolution infrastructure it needs to thrive, with DoneDeal.